hether you can appreciate the theoretical component that follows, the
Eden project still provides a workable way to promote "unity
in diversity" across all ethnic-cultural boundaries. This
in turn qualifies it as being singularly unique.
Most
professionals agree that without a tangible route to 'unity,' we have NO
means by which to resolve existing
conflicts that currently threaten human survival. At best, we can
only forestall their eventuality, by actively coercing combatants to
temporarily cease hostilities. Over the long haul, this intimidation
inevitably fosters hostility that further destabilizes already fragile
global situations. If
we are ever going to make meaningful headway in our quest for world
peace, it is imperative that we first understand the dynamics of
"foundational theory" which sculpts the way we think. Once
they are understood, we must then determine a way to apply these
dynamics to the critical issues at
hand.
Although the current practice of linearly approximating cause and
solution once worked, the advance of technology has now obsoleted it. Even as you read this, sufficient time for both qualification and
its implementation no longer exists in many critical equations upon which
the world depends for its continuance.
For
example: the flight time of nuclear armed missiles between potential
protagonists is down to less than 4 minutes in several parts of
the world. This reduced time interval clearly excludes human beings
from active decision making, because
there isn't sufficient time in which to do so. This has
resulted in the creation of "retaliatory schemes" that rely upon
"threshold
equations" that are executed solely by machines. Since computers
have no stake in the continuance of human life, our dependency
upon them in this regard, can only be seen as a death knell for mankind.
So
what is the answer? Since our thought process allows the resolution
of conflict to be seen in conflicting ways, all of which are similarly
valid relative to the foundational premise from which they spring, a
resolution to the world's current quandary cannot come from an analysis of
the information that we've assembled to date. It also cannot come
from the pursuit of new information that is gathered under the same
pretext as the old. If it could, peace would already be ours.
It isn't, because a route to 'unity' simply does not exist by way of
the information gathering techniques currently in use.
This is because
all conclusions arrived at by our current approach, necessarily
validate opposing positions in the process of becoming relevant. This
symbiosis occurs because of a foundational
limitation within our thought process itself. And, without understanding
its import, and utilizing it constructively, this limitation is
destined to continue to destabilize all attempts to acheive the desired
objective..
The
only way to overcome this problem is switching to the consideration of
interdependency within the field of question as opposed to the divergent
conclusions that
these questions solicit. This alone allows for the demonstration of a
commonality of intention between opposing difference; something that is
essential for convincing potential combatants to come together and
work together for the sake of creating a mutually viable approach
to peace. The only thing that can now ensure human survival. Anything less than active participation in a common cause
that is fundamental to all difference simply will not work.
Over
the years, man has created many global institutions for the purpose of
advancing world peace; but unfortunately, no one has ever come up with the
much needed prescription by which to achieve that stated goal.
To date, the Eden project is the only global peace
initiative that is capable of doing so. It achieves this status by
employing a "universal
format for making relevant inquiry into critical issues" at its very
core. This
is an extremely important difference that should not be underestimated, since it alone provides for a mutually acceptable global objective
that is actually obtainable.
The
attempt to achieve a consensus by any other means necessarily promotes
dichotomy while advancing specificity. This in turn reinforces the
importance of difference as opposed to sameness. By switching focus,
the Eden project provides a realistic way to qualify and
thereafter demonstrate mutual intent between fundamental difference. As such, it contains the only universally acceptable approach to problem
solving that is capable of providing temporal stability in an ever
changing world. This in turn is fundamental to
the reconstitution of hope, something without which mankind can no longer
survive without.
This
project is the direct result of the applicability of the discovery of 'certainty' to global situation. Since 'certainty' dictates the
basic form that knowledge must take in order to assume to relevance for
us, it cannot help but advance the cause of world stability when applied
to global situation. If you haven't already done so, consider what qualified
authority has to say about this project.
For
all of the above reasons, the Eden project is unique and
definitely warrants your immediate and serious attention. Emerging
from its conceptual stage it also needs all forms of
assistance. This includes exceptional people, meaningful group
affiliations, and a tangible (non-polarized) route to funding. If you
can helps -- Contact us. |
